<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 430 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that the imported goods were classified as scrap material, not subject to confiscation. The Tribunal found that the goods were indeed scrap obtained from dismantled transformers, aligning with previous case precedents. Additionally, the enhancement of the assessable value by the Adjudicating authority was overturned due to lack of evidence supporting the valuation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering factors such as the nature of the goods and contemporariness of imports in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 430 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that the imported goods were classified as scrap material, not subject to confiscation. The Tribunal found that the goods were indeed scrap obtained from dismantled transformers, aligning with previous case precedents. Additionally, the enhancement of the assessable value by the Adjudicating authority was overturned due to lack of evidence supporting the valuation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering factors such as the nature of the goods and contemporariness of imports in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>