<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331038</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the assessee was not in default for non-deduction of TDS on roaming charges and data link charges. The Court agreed that these payments do not qualify as fees for technical services under Section 194J as the processes involved are automated and do not require human intervention. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331038</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the assessee was not in default for non-deduction of TDS on roaming charges and data link charges. The Court agreed that these payments do not qualify as fees for technical services under Section 194J as the processes involved are automated and do not require human intervention. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>