<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 420 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the disallowance of 40% of the expenses claimed and the addition of Rs. 7,05,500 as undisclosed income. The Tribunal found that the expenses were supported by bills and vouchers, and the source of cash deposits was adequately explained. The order was pronounced on 29/06/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 420 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the disallowance of 40% of the expenses claimed and the addition of Rs. 7,05,500 as undisclosed income. The Tribunal found that the expenses were supported by bills and vouchers, and the source of cash deposits was adequately explained. The order was pronounced on 29/06/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>