<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Learning from judgment: Un-necessary litigation by tax payers and delaying tactics can be costly- Bombay High Court dismisses WP and allow cost in favour of tax department</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6928</link>
    <description>The court found that repeated adjournments by the petitioner, taken while simultaneously seeking an early hearing from the High Court, amounted to abuse of process. The CIT(A) had repeatedly fixed hearing dates and provided opportunities; the petitioner&#039;s inconsistent conduct and failure to challenge a prior rejection of a stay application undermined the petition. The court imposed a procedural sanction requiring payment of costs and made satisfaction of that payment a condition precedent for further hearing before the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:13:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:13:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Learning from judgment: Un-necessary litigation by tax payers and delaying tactics can be costly- Bombay High Court dismisses WP and allow cost in favour of tax department</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6928</link>
      <description>The court found that repeated adjournments by the petitioner, taken while simultaneously seeking an early hearing from the High Court, amounted to abuse of process. The CIT(A) had repeatedly fixed hearing dates and provided opportunities; the petitioner&#039;s inconsistent conduct and failure to challenge a prior rejection of a stay application undermined the petition. The court imposed a procedural sanction requiring payment of costs and made satisfaction of that payment a condition precedent for further hearing before the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:13:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>