<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1127 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185368</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of interest and unexplained cash credits made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT found that the borrowed funds were utilized for business purposes and the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the legitimacy of the cash credits. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1127 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185368</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of interest and unexplained cash credits made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT found that the borrowed funds were utilized for business purposes and the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the legitimacy of the cash credits. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>