https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185365 Orders denying rebate, together with the consequential interest and penalty orders, were set aside and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication. The authority was left free to re-examine the evidence supporting the claim that the appellants had purchased the boulders from the quarry owners, and to test the bills produced by the appellants against Rule 41 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975. The State accepted that the earlier grounds for denying rebate would not be pressed again, and the appellants were given liberty to challenge any adverse view taken in the fresh proceedings. en-us Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:01:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185365 Orders denying rebate, together with the consequential interest and penalty orders, were set aside and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication. The authority was left free to re-examine the evidence supporting the claim that the appellants had purchased the boulders from the quarry owners, and to test the bills produced by the appellants against Rule 41 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975. The State accepted that the earlier grounds for denying rebate would not be pressed again, and the appellants were given liberty to challenge any adverse view taken in the fresh proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185365