<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 624 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185361</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, concluding that no penalty under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was justified on the amounts of Rs. 1.63 crore and Rs. 110.50 lakhs. The ITAT found that the Revenue failed to disprove the explanations provided by the assessee regarding the &#039;on-money&#039; receipts and the absence of evidence supporting the penalties imposed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 624 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185361</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, concluding that no penalty under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was justified on the amounts of Rs. 1.63 crore and Rs. 110.50 lakhs. The ITAT found that the Revenue failed to disprove the explanations provided by the assessee regarding the &#039;on-money&#039; receipts and the absence of evidence supporting the penalties imposed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>