https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331019 The Court upheld the validity of a Show-Cause Notice demanding the reversal of CENVAT Credit for trading services in specific years despite the petitioner's arguments against it. The Court emphasized the need for the petitioner to participate in the proceedings, allowing authorities to address objections before a final decision. The petitioner was granted three weeks to respond to the notice, with the Court refusing to intervene and dismissing the Writ Petition without costs. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331019 The Court upheld the validity of a Show-Cause Notice demanding the reversal of CENVAT Credit for trading services in specific years despite the petitioner's arguments against it. The Court emphasized the need for the petitioner to participate in the proceedings, allowing authorities to address objections before a final decision. The petitioner was granted three weeks to respond to the notice, with the Court refusing to intervene and dismissing the Writ Petition without costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331019