<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 93 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185352</link>
    <description>Rent from factory buildings and godowns is assessable as income from property, not business income, where the assessee has wholly discontinued the underlying business and the property no longer forms part of an ongoing commercial undertaking. Although rent from a commercial asset may sometimes retain business character if the asset remains part of the business apparatus and is only temporarily let out, that principle does not apply when business activity has ceased entirely and the property is being exploited independently of any continuing trade. On these facts, the rental receipts fell under the property head and the Revenue&#039;s treatment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 93 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185352</link>
      <description>Rent from factory buildings and godowns is assessable as income from property, not business income, where the assessee has wholly discontinued the underlying business and the property no longer forms part of an ongoing commercial undertaking. Although rent from a commercial asset may sometimes retain business character if the asset remains part of the business apparatus and is only temporarily let out, that principle does not apply when business activity has ceased entirely and the property is being exploited independently of any continuing trade. On these facts, the rental receipts fell under the property head and the Revenue&#039;s treatment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>