<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CENVAT Credit Reversal Under Sub-Rule (3A) is Procedural, Not Mandatory; Revenue&#039;s Mandatory Assertion Rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30717</link>
    <description>Reversal of cenvat credit - Sub-Rule (3A) is only a procedure - Consequently, the argument of Revenue is that the appellants exercising option is mandatory and on its failure, the appellant has no other option but to accept and apply Rule 6(3)(i) and make payment of 5%/10% of the sale price of the exempted goods or exempted services is not acceptable - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:05:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CENVAT Credit Reversal Under Sub-Rule (3A) is Procedural, Not Mandatory; Revenue&#039;s Mandatory Assertion Rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30717</link>
      <description>Reversal of cenvat credit - Sub-Rule (3A) is only a procedure - Consequently, the argument of Revenue is that the appellants exercising option is mandatory and on its failure, the appellant has no other option but to accept and apply Rule 6(3)(i) and make payment of 5%/10% of the sale price of the exempted goods or exempted services is not acceptable - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:05:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>