<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 386 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331002</link>
    <description>Rectified spirit was treated as the same commodity as ethyl alcohol for tariff purposes, following the view that rectified spirit is spirit purified by distillation and that the two expressions are one and the same for the issue in dispute. On that basis, rectified spirit not meant for human consumption was classified under tariff item 22072000. Because the classification premise in the show cause notice failed, the demand and the denial of CENVAT credit could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 386 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331002</link>
      <description>Rectified spirit was treated as the same commodity as ethyl alcohol for tariff purposes, following the view that rectified spirit is spirit purified by distillation and that the two expressions are one and the same for the issue in dispute. On that basis, rectified spirit not meant for human consumption was classified under tariff item 22072000. Because the classification premise in the show cause notice failed, the demand and the denial of CENVAT credit could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>