<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 385 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for re-quantification of the refund related to goods exported under bond. The appellant was directed to provide necessary documents for quantification, with the adjudication process to be completed within three months. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand for further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 385 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for re-quantification of the refund related to goods exported under bond. The appellant was directed to provide necessary documents for quantification, with the adjudication process to be completed within three months. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand for further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>