<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 383 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, per S. S. Garg, set aside the impugned order, finding it legally unsustainable and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief. The judgment focused on the clearance of goods to a SEZ developer without duty payment, considering the applicability of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision was influenced by previous tribunal and high court judgments, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on legal interpretations and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 383 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, per S. S. Garg, set aside the impugned order, finding it legally unsustainable and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief. The judgment focused on the clearance of goods to a SEZ developer without duty payment, considering the applicability of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision was influenced by previous tribunal and high court judgments, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on legal interpretations and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>