<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 380 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330996</link>
    <description>Job-work clearances are valued by applying the settled principles for assessable value under the relevant valuation regime. For the pre-1.7.2000 period, the comparable goods and residuary valuation framework under Rule 7 read with Rule 6(b) of the 1975 Valuation Rules was considered in line with the principle that job-work goods are valued on job charges plus input cost, without adding the buyer&#039;s overheads or profit where the parties deal on a principal-to-principal basis. The later valuation rules and circulars were stated not to alter that approach after 1.7.2000, and valuation methods are to converge to a common, reasonable assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 380 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330996</link>
      <description>Job-work clearances are valued by applying the settled principles for assessable value under the relevant valuation regime. For the pre-1.7.2000 period, the comparable goods and residuary valuation framework under Rule 7 read with Rule 6(b) of the 1975 Valuation Rules was considered in line with the principle that job-work goods are valued on job charges plus input cost, without adding the buyer&#039;s overheads or profit where the parties deal on a principal-to-principal basis. The later valuation rules and circulars were stated not to alter that approach after 1.7.2000, and valuation methods are to converge to a common, reasonable assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>