<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1065 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially, directing the AO to grant the deduction under section 80IA for infrastructure development. The Tribunal remitted the issue of the provision for the pension scheme back to the AO for further assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the Godavari Lift Irrigation Scheme deduction and the provision for warranty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1065 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially, directing the AO to grant the deduction under section 80IA for infrastructure development. The Tribunal remitted the issue of the provision for the pension scheme back to the AO for further assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the Godavari Lift Irrigation Scheme deduction and the provision for warranty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>