https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185343 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, recognizing their ownership of the 'SAGAR' brand name and validating their claim for exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003. The tribunal overturned the impugned order, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the significance of establishing prior usage and common ownership of brand names to determine eligibility for exemptions under relevant notifications, highlighting the importance of historical usage and registration patterns in ascertaining rightful ownership and entitlement to statutory benefits. en-us Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:29:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185343 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, recognizing their ownership of the 'SAGAR' brand name and validating their claim for exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003. The tribunal overturned the impugned order, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the significance of establishing prior usage and common ownership of brand names to determine eligibility for exemptions under relevant notifications, highlighting the importance of historical usage and registration patterns in ascertaining rightful ownership and entitlement to statutory benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185343