<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 901 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185329</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeals against the CIT(A) order for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) orders, restored the appeals, and directed to condone the delay in tax payment if the seized cash was adjusted, and dispose off the appeals on merits after giving a hearing to the assessee. The appeals of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:30:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 901 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185329</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeals against the CIT(A) order for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) orders, restored the appeals, and directed to condone the delay in tax payment if the seized cash was adjusted, and dispose off the appeals on merits after giving a hearing to the assessee. The appeals of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>