<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 365 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330981</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to treat the income from share transactions as capital gains rather than business income. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was restricted to the dividend income earned during the year, partially allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 365 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330981</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to treat the income from share transactions as capital gains rather than business income. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was restricted to the dividend income earned during the year, partially allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>