<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 363 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of repair expenses for both the building and plant and machinery. The repairs were deemed necessary for regular maintenance and did not result in enduring benefits or capacity increase. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the expenses should be treated as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 363 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of repair expenses for both the building and plant and machinery. The repairs were deemed necessary for regular maintenance and did not result in enduring benefits or capacity increase. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the expenses should be treated as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>