<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 362 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order was passed under section 153A of the Income Tax Act, and the additions made in the assessment were not justified based on the search and seizure operation. Emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for additions in the assessment, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 362 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order was passed under section 153A of the Income Tax Act, and the additions made in the assessment were not justified based on the search and seizure operation. Emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for additions in the assessment, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>