<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 361 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of provisions directly debited in the balance sheet, emphasizing the importance of consistency in accounting methods and the lack of evidence to support the rejection of the assessee&#039;s method. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 361 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of provisions directly debited in the balance sheet, emphasizing the importance of consistency in accounting methods and the lack of evidence to support the rejection of the assessee&#039;s method. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>