<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 96 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to assess duty on a combination pack of &#039;hair cream&#039; and &#039;shoe polish&#039; based on the combined printed M.R.P value of Rs. 33, despite the &#039;shoe polish&#039; being provided as a free-supply. The dispute solely revolved around the excisability of the &#039;shoe polish,&#039; which both parties acknowledged. As the excisability was undisputed, the Tribunal affirmed the duty assessment based on the combined M.R.P, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 96 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to assess duty on a combination pack of &#039;hair cream&#039; and &#039;shoe polish&#039; based on the combined printed M.R.P value of Rs. 33, despite the &#039;shoe polish&#039; being provided as a free-supply. The dispute solely revolved around the excisability of the &#039;shoe polish,&#039; which both parties acknowledged. As the excisability was undisputed, the Tribunal affirmed the duty assessment based on the combined M.R.P, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>