<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 356 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330972</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the cash payments made directly into the bank accounts of the wholesalers were genuine, met the business expediency criteria, and fell under the exceptions of Rule 6DD. The disallowance under Section 40A(3) was thus reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 356 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330972</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the cash payments made directly into the bank accounts of the wholesalers were genuine, met the business expediency criteria, and fell under the exceptions of Rule 6DD. The disallowance under Section 40A(3) was thus reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>