<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1450 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment by issuing notice u/s 148 before the expiry of the period for issuing notice u/s 143(2) was bad in law. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee on this ground. However, regarding the taxability of donations given to Ramakrishna Mutt for Tsunami victims, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence of proper utilization and upheld the taxability of the donations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 18:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1450 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment by issuing notice u/s 148 before the expiry of the period for issuing notice u/s 143(2) was bad in law. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee on this ground. However, regarding the taxability of donations given to Ramakrishna Mutt for Tsunami victims, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence of proper utilization and upheld the taxability of the donations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>