https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185325 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court's interim injunction, permitting the appellant to use the trade mark 'MICROTEL', logo 'M', and carton for selling electrical and electronic products. The Court found no likelihood of confusion between the trade names 'MICRONIX' and 'MICROTEL', emphasizing the common descriptive nature of the term 'micro' in technology products. Differences in carton descriptions and colors were also noted. The decision was made for the interim stage pending further evidence review, with costs to be determined in the final hearing. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Aug 2016 18:29:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185325 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court's interim injunction, permitting the appellant to use the trade mark 'MICROTEL', logo 'M', and carton for selling electrical and electronic products. The Court found no likelihood of confusion between the trade names 'MICRONIX' and 'MICROTEL', emphasizing the common descriptive nature of the term 'micro' in technology products. Differences in carton descriptions and colors were also noted. The decision was made for the interim stage pending further evidence review, with costs to be determined in the final hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185325