<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 352 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of CENVAT credit on outward transportation by the Commissioner was not legally sound. It concluded that transportation of finished goods qualifies as an input service under the CENVAT Credit Rules, as there was no specific exclusion for outward transportation in the definition of input service. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and directing for any consequential relief in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 352 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of CENVAT credit on outward transportation by the Commissioner was not legally sound. It concluded that transportation of finished goods qualifies as an input service under the CENVAT Credit Rules, as there was no specific exclusion for outward transportation in the definition of input service. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and directing for any consequential relief in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>