<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 94 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to limit the special discount given to customer M/s. L &amp;amp; T to 20%, aligning it with discounts provided to other buyers. The Tribunal determined that the extra discount was intended for sales promotion activities, which were not obligatory for other buyers, and thus, the higher discount was not permissible. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that the special discount could not be categorized as a quantity discount due to the absence of specified minimum purchase requirements for L &amp;amp; T. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the special discount was restricted to 20% for all buyers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 94 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to limit the special discount given to customer M/s. L &amp;amp; T to 20%, aligning it with discounts provided to other buyers. The Tribunal determined that the extra discount was intended for sales promotion activities, which were not obligatory for other buyers, and thus, the higher discount was not permissible. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that the special discount could not be categorized as a quantity discount due to the absence of specified minimum purchase requirements for L &amp;amp; T. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the special discount was restricted to 20% for all buyers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>