https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330964 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for recovery of duty and interest under Central Excise Rules. Relying on precedents declaring Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, the Tribunal found the demand for duty in cash, despite cenvat credit use, unjust. The decision was influenced by judgments from various High Courts and CESTAT, concluding the demand was unsustainable in law. The appellant's position was supported, and consequential relief was granted. The Tribunal's analysis emphasized the settled nature of the issue in favor of the appellant based on established legal principles. en-us Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:18:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330964 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for recovery of duty and interest under Central Excise Rules. Relying on precedents declaring Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, the Tribunal found the demand for duty in cash, despite cenvat credit use, unjust. The decision was influenced by judgments from various High Courts and CESTAT, concluding the demand was unsustainable in law. The appellant's position was supported, and consequential relief was granted. The Tribunal's analysis emphasized the settled nature of the issue in favor of the appellant based on established legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330964