<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 347 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330963</link>
    <description>Excise duty on waste and scrap cannot be sustained when the liability is confirmed on a basis different from the show cause notice, because such a shift violates natural justice and travels beyond the pleaded case. The notice alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT/Modvat credit on machinery and clearance of scrap without duty, but the lower authorities upheld demand instead on the theory that the scrap arose from mechanical working of metal under Chapter Heading 7204. The text states that this credit allegation was not established, and that scrap generated from repair, maintenance, or dismantling of old machinery could not be taxed on the new basis. The demand was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 347 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330963</link>
      <description>Excise duty on waste and scrap cannot be sustained when the liability is confirmed on a basis different from the show cause notice, because such a shift violates natural justice and travels beyond the pleaded case. The notice alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT/Modvat credit on machinery and clearance of scrap without duty, but the lower authorities upheld demand instead on the theory that the scrap arose from mechanical working of metal under Chapter Heading 7204. The text states that this credit allegation was not established, and that scrap generated from repair, maintenance, or dismantling of old machinery could not be taxed on the new basis. The demand was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>