<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 340 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330956</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The respondents&#039; non-declaration offense resulted in penalties, but absolute confiscation of the gold was not warranted. The respondents could redeem the gold upon payment of duty and fine, as they were not deemed to be involved in absolute smuggling activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 340 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330956</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The respondents&#039; non-declaration offense resulted in penalties, but absolute confiscation of the gold was not warranted. The respondents could redeem the gold upon payment of duty and fine, as they were not deemed to be involved in absolute smuggling activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>