<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 321 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330937</link>
    <description>The High Court returned the substantial question of law unanswered, deeming it academic post the Apex Court&#039;s decision in Jyotendrasinhji. The judgment emphasized evolving interpretations of tax laws, particularly on the assessability of trusts under sections 164 and 166. It underscored the significance of legal precedents and subsequent judicial decisions in shaping the understanding and application of tax statutes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:54:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 321 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330937</link>
      <description>The High Court returned the substantial question of law unanswered, deeming it academic post the Apex Court&#039;s decision in Jyotendrasinhji. The judgment emphasized evolving interpretations of tax laws, particularly on the assessability of trusts under sections 164 and 166. It underscored the significance of legal precedents and subsequent judicial decisions in shaping the understanding and application of tax statutes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>