<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 319 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330935</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai remitted the issue back to the AO to verify if the impugned amount was outstanding at the end of the assessment years, following the appeal involving the addition of Rs. 15,24,800 under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS on labour charges paid towards embroidery work. The ITAT allowed the ground for statistical purposes and partly allowed the appeal, with the order pronounced on 30th June 2016 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:54:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 319 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330935</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai remitted the issue back to the AO to verify if the impugned amount was outstanding at the end of the assessment years, following the appeal involving the addition of Rs. 15,24,800 under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS on labour charges paid towards embroidery work. The ITAT allowed the ground for statistical purposes and partly allowed the appeal, with the order pronounced on 30th June 2016 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>