<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 313 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, sustaining the addition of Rs. 40,000 while deleting the remaining Rs. 3,54,900 in relation to cash deposits in the bank account. The Tribunal found that certain deposits and the opening balance were not relevant to the assessment year. Additionally, the addition for household expenses lacked substantiation and was therefore removed. The decision was issued on 29/06/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:54:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 313 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, sustaining the addition of Rs. 40,000 while deleting the remaining Rs. 3,54,900 in relation to cash deposits in the bank account. The Tribunal found that certain deposits and the opening balance were not relevant to the assessment year. Additionally, the addition for household expenses lacked substantiation and was therefore removed. The decision was issued on 29/06/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>