<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 311 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to decide all appeals together after verifying the information, inquiries, and intentions related to the benami account. The decision highlighted the importance of a comprehensive review of facts and consistency in penalty imposition across multiple assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 311 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to decide all appeals together after verifying the information, inquiries, and intentions related to the benami account. The decision highlighted the importance of a comprehensive review of facts and consistency in penalty imposition across multiple assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>