<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 707 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting penalties imposed for assessment years 2003-04 and 2005-06. Lack of evidence showing intentional concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars led to the decision. Mere acceptance of additions in quantum appeal did not justify penalties. Legal arguments and precedents cited by the assessee supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to overturn penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 707 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting penalties imposed for assessment years 2003-04 and 2005-06. Lack of evidence showing intentional concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars led to the decision. Mere acceptance of additions in quantum appeal did not justify penalties. Legal arguments and precedents cited by the assessee supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to overturn penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>