<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 307 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by M/s Magnum Ventures Ltd., setting aside most demands and penalties related to cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) and penalties under Rule 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant&#039;s argument that services provided were not exempted was accepted, leading to the dismissal of significant demands. The importance of maintaining separate accounts for cenvat credit was highlighted, with penalties mostly being set aside except for a minor penalty concerning capital goods credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 307 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by M/s Magnum Ventures Ltd., setting aside most demands and penalties related to cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) and penalties under Rule 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant&#039;s argument that services provided were not exempted was accepted, leading to the dismissal of significant demands. The importance of maintaining separate accounts for cenvat credit was highlighted, with penalties mostly being set aside except for a minor penalty concerning capital goods credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>