https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330920 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and the forfeiture of the security deposit. The Tribunal found that the appellant had the authorization letter from the exporter, which was not forged, and that the Revenue failed to prove otherwise. Despite the delay in producing the authorization during the investigation, the Tribunal held that there was no basis for revoking the license. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330920 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and the forfeiture of the security deposit. The Tribunal found that the appellant had the authorization letter from the exporter, which was not forged, and that the Revenue failed to prove otherwise. Despite the delay in producing the authorization during the investigation, the Tribunal held that there was no basis for revoking the license. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330920