<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 89 - CESTAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the enhanced penalty imposed on the appellant for service tax liabilities. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely tax payments and adherence to the provisions of the Extra-ordinary Taxpayer Friendly Scheme. It clarified that the appellant, who settled their tax liability before registration with the Department, was eligible for the scheme&#039;s benefits, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The order of the Assistant Commissioner confirming the demand for service tax was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 89 - CESTAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the enhanced penalty imposed on the appellant for service tax liabilities. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely tax payments and adherence to the provisions of the Extra-ordinary Taxpayer Friendly Scheme. It clarified that the appellant, who settled their tax liability before registration with the Department, was eligible for the scheme&#039;s benefits, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The order of the Assistant Commissioner confirming the demand for service tax was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>