<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 301 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330917</link>
    <description>The court deemed the initial sealing and re-sealing of the Petitioner&#039;s premises on 2nd and 11th July 2016 as illegal due to lack of proper authorization and non-compliance with statutory requirements under the DVAT Act. The court ordered the immediate de-sealing of the premises, return of seized documents, and awarded costs to the Petitioner. Officials involved were criticized, and disciplinary actions were recommended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 301 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330917</link>
      <description>The court deemed the initial sealing and re-sealing of the Petitioner&#039;s premises on 2nd and 11th July 2016 as illegal due to lack of proper authorization and non-compliance with statutory requirements under the DVAT Act. The court ordered the immediate de-sealing of the premises, return of seized documents, and awarded costs to the Petitioner. Officials involved were criticized, and disciplinary actions were recommended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>