<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1094 - ITAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to refer the matter to the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner for a final decision on granting interest u/s 244A for Assessment Year 2006-07. For Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, the Tribunal restored the income estimation to 4% of total turnover, as declared by the assessee, rejecting higher estimations by the AO and CIT(A). The interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was upheld as mandatory, with the AO directed to recalculate interest in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Appeals for 2007-08 and 2008-09 were allowed, and the appeal for 2006-07 was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:23:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1094 - ITAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to refer the matter to the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner for a final decision on granting interest u/s 244A for Assessment Year 2006-07. For Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, the Tribunal restored the income estimation to 4% of total turnover, as declared by the assessee, rejecting higher estimations by the AO and CIT(A). The interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was upheld as mandatory, with the AO directed to recalculate interest in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Appeals for 2007-08 and 2008-09 were allowed, and the appeal for 2006-07 was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>