<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 288 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order. The decision was based on the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on the basis of documents issued to the Head Office. The Appellant was directed to produce the original duty paying document for verification, and the appeal was allowed on merit with this condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 288 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order. The decision was based on the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on the basis of documents issued to the Head Office. The Appellant was directed to produce the original duty paying document for verification, and the appeal was allowed on merit with this condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>