https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330899 The appellant's request for early appeal hearing was granted, and the matter was resolved on the same day. The case focused on interpreting a trade notice regarding physical control of cigarette manufacturing units. The appellant argued the notice did not apply due to operating above 50% capacity, with no statutory provision for such control. The judge found the notice inapplicable to the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief. The decision emphasized the lack of statutory basis for physical control over the manufacturing unit, resolving the issues raised in the case. en-us Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330899 The appellant's request for early appeal hearing was granted, and the matter was resolved on the same day. The case focused on interpreting a trade notice regarding physical control of cigarette manufacturing units. The appellant argued the notice did not apply due to operating above 50% capacity, with no statutory provision for such control. The judge found the notice inapplicable to the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief. The decision emphasized the lack of statutory basis for physical control over the manufacturing unit, resolving the issues raised in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330899