<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1115 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185295</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that inter-corporate deposits do not fall under the definition of loan or advance as per the relevant sections. The Court found that including deposits as advances for interest tax purposes would have unintended consequences. As a result, the Court dismissed all appeals, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1115 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185295</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that inter-corporate deposits do not fall under the definition of loan or advance as per the relevant sections. The Court found that including deposits as advances for interest tax purposes would have unintended consequences. As a result, the Court dismissed all appeals, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>