https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330885 The court dismissed the petition challenging a notice by the Tax Recovery Officer certifying a due amount under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner's request for an early hearing of the appeal before the CIT (A) was hindered by their repeated adjournment requests, which were considered frivolous and an abuse of the legal process. The court directed the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 20,000 to the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-13, Mumbai, by a specified date for the appeal to proceed, highlighting the need for compliance with the cost requirement. Failure to make the payment within the stipulated time would result in the appeal not being heard. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2016 13:52:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330885 The court dismissed the petition challenging a notice by the Tax Recovery Officer certifying a due amount under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner's request for an early hearing of the appeal before the CIT (A) was hindered by their repeated adjournment requests, which were considered frivolous and an abuse of the legal process. The court directed the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 20,000 to the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-13, Mumbai, by a specified date for the appeal to proceed, highlighting the need for compliance with the cost requirement. Failure to make the payment within the stipulated time would result in the appeal not being heard. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330885