<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 268 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330884</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, dismissing the appeals and finding no merit in the contentions raised by the assessee. The Court determined that the statement recorded under section 132(4) of the partner of the firm was valid evidence and that the claim of expenditure by way of interest to the partners lacked proper documentation, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 268 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330884</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, dismissing the appeals and finding no merit in the contentions raised by the assessee. The Court determined that the statement recorded under section 132(4) of the partner of the firm was valid evidence and that the claim of expenditure by way of interest to the partners lacked proper documentation, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>