<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (10) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185279</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions that there was no valid partition in the Hindu undivided family, the partnership deed was deemed sham, and the assets remained property of the undivided family. The court emphasized the lack of convincing evidence supporting the partition and partnership claims. The Department was granted costs, and the reference was resolved in line with the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 17:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (10) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185279</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions that there was no valid partition in the Hindu undivided family, the partnership deed was deemed sham, and the assets remained property of the undivided family. The court emphasized the lack of convincing evidence supporting the partition and partnership claims. The Department was granted costs, and the reference was resolved in line with the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>