<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1064 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185275</link>
    <description>The court ordered Respondent Bank to provide the Petitioner with requested documents within two weeks, enabling the Petitioner to submit further explanations. This decision aimed to uphold the principles of natural justice and ensure a fair defense against the wilful defaulter classification, emphasizing the importance of disclosing all relevant materials, including the Ernst &amp;amp; Young report, relied upon by the Scrutiny Committee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 17:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1064 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185275</link>
      <description>The court ordered Respondent Bank to provide the Petitioner with requested documents within two weeks, enabling the Petitioner to submit further explanations. This decision aimed to uphold the principles of natural justice and ensure a fair defense against the wilful defaulter classification, emphasizing the importance of disclosing all relevant materials, including the Ernst &amp;amp; Young report, relied upon by the Scrutiny Committee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>