<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 185 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4414</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the imposition of the minimum penalty under Section 76 of the Act but reduced the penalty amount from Rs. 69,900 to Rs. 15,900. The appellants&#039; claim of ignorance of the law was dismissed due to belated payments. The impugned order was affirmed with the modification of the penalty amount, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 185 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4414</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the imposition of the minimum penalty under Section 76 of the Act but reduced the penalty amount from Rs. 69,900 to Rs. 15,900. The appellants&#039; claim of ignorance of the law was dismissed due to belated payments. The impugned order was affirmed with the modification of the penalty amount, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>