<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 249 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330865</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the Punjab VAT Act was held admissible in full on pet coke used for generation of electrical energy for captive consumption. Section 13(1) allows credit on taxable purchases used in the course of business, while Section 13(4) imposes only a limited restriction on specified fuels and lubricants, and Section 13(5)(i) otherwise excludes goods used in generation of electricity but expressly restores credit for captive consumption subject to Section 13(4). As pet coke was not among the specifically excluded goods, the provisions were read harmoniously and credit could not be denied by an expansive reading of the restriction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 249 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330865</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the Punjab VAT Act was held admissible in full on pet coke used for generation of electrical energy for captive consumption. Section 13(1) allows credit on taxable purchases used in the course of business, while Section 13(4) imposes only a limited restriction on specified fuels and lubricants, and Section 13(5)(i) otherwise excludes goods used in generation of electricity but expressly restores credit for captive consumption subject to Section 13(4). As pet coke was not among the specifically excluded goods, the provisions were read harmoniously and credit could not be denied by an expansive reading of the restriction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>