<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 245 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330861</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of service tax on the commission received for selling SIM cards to BSNL under the business auxiliary service category. The decision was based on precedents citing that the sale of SIM cards belonging to BSNL, where BSNL had already paid service tax, did not constitute providing business auxiliary services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 245 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330861</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of service tax on the commission received for selling SIM cards to BSNL under the business auxiliary service category. The decision was based on precedents citing that the sale of SIM cards belonging to BSNL, where BSNL had already paid service tax, did not constitute providing business auxiliary services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>